In message <eb7c6a6e-9813-4bdb-8541-706a58ebad3a@z11g2000prl.googlegroups.com>, drceephd@insightbb.com wrote:
> On Jul 25, 9:41 am, "D. C. Sessions" <d...@lumbercartel.com> wrote:
>> You misunderstand Chuckles. To him, cancer *is* the cure.
>> (He specifically told us so elsewhere in this thread.)
>
> Two errors here.
> One, I have never said cancer is a cure. What I have said is that
> normal cancer ( not the induced variety ) is a body defense mechanism,
> and as such can be reversed without drugs and radiation.
Either way, per you it's a Good Thing that the "innate intelligence"
does for the good of the person.
> Two, you need to cease insulting scientists by calling medicine a
> science. The study of chemistry and physics is scientific but the
> practice of medicine is un-scientific. Calling medicine scientific is
> an insult to all scientists in the world.
Science is as science does. Medicine follows the scientific method,
with the canonical steps of observation, hypothesis, experimental
tests, formalization, and iteration. (Not that one would expect
you to have learned that in your Martian primary schools.)
You, on the other hand, have stated that your "science" does not
and cannot formulate falsifiable propositions with predictive
power (such as, how to cause smallpox.) Thus your pronouncements
regarding what is, and is not, scientific are idiosyncratic and
not particularly interesting to anyone but yourself.
| The brighter the stupid burns, the more |
| chance that someone will see the light. |
+- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> -+
Polly the Parr…
Richard Schultz
