On Jul 26, 11:50 am, Zombywoof <Zomby-W...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 02:09:07 -0700 (PDT), crisology
>
>
> Again research who simply focus on animals really, really miss the
> boat because they neglect to include all of the environmental factors
> of humans into the equation, and the fact that the animals are studied
> outside their normal habita
Which is why I made it clear the unnatural diets of coke, cooked
steak, alcohol, etc are factors. You clipped this in the following
paragraph:
"What animal naturally "experiments" using such self destructive ways?
It is very unnatural but not uncommon to be drawn to such drugs. Just
as the most common foods are most unnatural yet sought after more
frequently (grilled steak, coke, etc)"
> >"study shows a high association among drinking, alcoholism, and child
> >molestation. Forty-nine percent of the child molesters were drinking
> >at the time of commission of the offense, and 34% were drinking
> >heavily, defined as 10 or more beers or the equivalent." Annals of the
> >New York Academy of Sciences, Vol 273, Issue 1 492-496, Copyright ©
> >1976 by New York Academy of Sciences.
>
> Because the use of mind-altering substances break-down the societal
> taboos in humans allowing they to act out on their animal impulses.
Society isn't the barrier for impulses to molest or eat aberrant diets
that contribute to obesity. Rather, society/customs ARE causal agents.
> Their is not "molestation" in the members of the animal kingdom
Molestation is extremely rare in the animal kingdom & this supports my
point. As I said, no other animal willingly/knowingly engages in self
destructive behavior (eat unnatural cooked food known to have natural
& synthetic carcinogens, etc)
C
aka_velcro
ReaderRabbit
