In message <6g3kuvFbaa97U1@mid.individual.net>, MothWrangler wrote:
> D. C. Sessions wrote:
>> In message <6fs27sFd3f8mU1@mid.individual.net>, MothWrangler wrote:
>>>D. C. Sessions wrote:
>>>>In message <6fpm8vFbisb8U1@mid.individual.net>, MothWrangler wrote:
>>>>>D. C. Sessions wrote:
>>>>>>In message <6fmbe9Fc7n04U1@mid.individual.net>, MothWrangler wrote:
>>>>>>>D. C. Sessions wrote:
>>>>>>>>In message <6fjte8FbrgcsU3@mid.individual.net>, MothWrangler wrote:
>>>>>>>>>D. C. Sessions wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>In message <6fjlqkFbpvpnU2@mid.individual.net>, MothWrangler wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>D. C. Sessions wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>In message <6ff2eqFb7c90U1@mid.individual.net>, MothWrangler wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>D. C. Sessions wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In message <6f9kfsFajio4U1@mid.individual.net>, MothWrangler wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>D. C. Sessions wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In message <6f4f8qF9p78fU2@mid.individual.net>, MothWrangler wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>D. C. Sessions wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In message <6f4ccfF9qmvhU1@mid.individual.net>, MothWrangler wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Peter Bowditch wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>MothWrangler <mothwrangler@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>D. C. Sessions wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In message <6f1q23F9g1dbU1@mid.individual.net>, MothWrangler wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>D. C. Sessions wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In message <6f1b06F93o6vU1@mid.individual.net>, MothWrangler wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>D. C. Sessions wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In message <6eujcvF92s5qU1@mid.individual.net>, MothWrangler wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>D. C. Sessions wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In message <g6c3nb$vsg$5@news.iucc.ac.il>, Richard Schultz wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In article <lronl5-evf.ln1@news.lumbercartel.com>, D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>:> :> Why have you not posted similar criticisms of Vernon?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>:>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>:> : Are you asking rhetorical questions?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>:>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>:> Who, me?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>: Who else?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Do I *look* like the kind of person who would ask rhetorical questions?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Who do you think I am? Superman?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Are you and Richard having a good time in this thread?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Would you like to join?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Do I seem like someone who'd be interested in doing that?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>How would I know?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Haven't you known me for years?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Can you ever really know another person?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Feeling philosophical today are you?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Who isn't?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You're rather late coming to join us now, aren't you?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*US*? Do you have a mouse in your pocket?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>There isn't an "us"? :-(
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>So, you're admitting that thing in your pocket is a mouse?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Did you think I was just glad to see you?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>How was I supposed to know that time would be different from all the others?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>How could you forget?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>So, your change in attitude is *my* fault?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Was that a rhetorical question?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>That's the essential question, isn't it?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Do you think it has an answer?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Do you really think the answer is all that important?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Doesn't that depend on whether there *is* an answer?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>If it's true that there isn't an answer, what other response can we give
>>>>>>>to one question but to reply with another one?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>What's the point of that?
>>>>>
>>>>>If there's a better alternative, why haven't you offered one?
>>>>
>>>>Are we requiring answers to go with every question now?
>>>
>>>Is this MHA?
>>
>> Would that imply "yes" or "no?"
>
> Why does this need to be so darn complicated?
What would be simple enough for you?
| The brighter the stupid burns, the more |
| chance that someone will see the light. |
+- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> -+
