D. C. Sessions wrote:
> In message <6fmbe9Fc7n04U1@mid.individual.net>, MothWrangler wrote:
>
>>D. C. Sessions wrote:
>>
>>>In message <6fjte8FbrgcsU3@mid.individual.net>, MothWrangler wrote:
>>>
>>>>D. C. Sessions wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>In message <6fjlqkFbpvpnU2@mid.individual.net>, MothWrangler wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>D. C. Sessions wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>In message <6ff2eqFb7c90U1@mid.individual.net>, MothWrangler wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>D. C. Sessions wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>In message <6f9kfsFajio4U1@mid.individual.net>, MothWrangler wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>D. C. Sessions wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>In message <6f4f8qF9p78fU2@mid.individual.net>, MothWrangler wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>D. C. Sessions wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>In message <6f4ccfF9qmvhU1@mid.individual.net>, MothWrangler wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Peter Bowditch wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>MothWrangler <mothwrangler@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>D. C. Sessions wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In message <6f1q23F9g1dbU1@mid.individual.net>, MothWrangler wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>D. C. Sessions wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In message <6f1b06F93o6vU1@mid.individual.net>, MothWrangler wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>D. C. Sessions wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In message <6eujcvF92s5qU1@mid.individual.net>, MothWrangler wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>D. C. Sessions wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In message <g6c3nb$vsg$5@news.iucc.ac.il>, Richard Schultz wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In article <lronl5-evf.ln1@news.lumbercartel.com>, D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> wrote:
>
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>:> :> Why have you not posted similar criticisms of Vernon?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>:>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>:> : Are you asking rhetorical questions?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>:>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>:> Who, me?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>: Who else?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Do I *look* like the kind of person who would ask rhetorical questions?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Who do you think I am? Superman?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Are you and Richard having a good time in this thread?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Would you like to join?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Do I seem like someone who'd be interested in doing that?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>How would I know?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Haven't you known me for years?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Can you ever really know another person?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Feeling philosophical today are you?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Who isn't?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You're rather late coming to join us now, aren't you?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>*US*? Do you have a mouse in your pocket?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>There isn't an "us"? :-(
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>So, you're admitting that thing in your pocket is a mouse?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Did you think I was just glad to see you?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>How was I supposed to know that time would be different from all the others?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>How could you forget?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>So, your change in attitude is *my* fault?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Was that a rhetorical question?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>That's the essential question, isn't it?
>>>>>
>>>>>Do you think it has an answer?
>>>>
>>>>Do you really think the answer is all that important?
>>>
>>>Doesn't that depend on whether there *is* an answer?
>>
>>If it's true that there isn't an answer, what other response can we give
>>to one question but to reply with another one?
>
>
> What's the point of that?
>
If there's a better alternative, why haven't you offered one?
Proud member since 2007, WWWSC #1
Ann/Emma Anne #4
