D. C. Sessions wrote:
> In message <6fjte8FbrgcsU3@mid.individual.net>, MothWrangler wrote:
>
>>D. C. Sessions wrote:
>>
>>>In message <6fjlqkFbpvpnU2@mid.individual.net>, MothWrangler wrote:
>>>
>>>>D. C. Sessions wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>In message <6ff2eqFb7c90U1@mid.individual.net>, MothWrangler wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>D. C. Sessions wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>In message <6f9kfsFajio4U1@mid.individual.net>, MothWrangler wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>D. C. Sessions wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>In message <6f4f8qF9p78fU2@mid.individual.net>, MothWrangler wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>D. C. Sessions wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>In message <6f4ccfF9qmvhU1@mid.individual.net>, MothWrangler wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Peter Bowditch wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>MothWrangler <mothwrangler@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>D. C. Sessions wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In message <6f1q23F9g1dbU1@mid.individual.net>, MothWrangler wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>D. C. Sessions wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In message <6f1b06F93o6vU1@mid.individual.net>, MothWrangler wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>D. C. Sessions wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In message <6eujcvF92s5qU1@mid.individual.net>, MothWrangler wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>D. C. Sessions wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In message <g6c3nb$vsg$5@news.iucc.ac.il>, Richard Schultz wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In article <lronl5-evf.ln1@news.lumbercartel.com>, D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> wrote:
>
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>:> :> Why have you not posted similar criticisms of Vernon?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>:>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>:> : Are you asking rhetorical questions?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>:>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>:> Who, me?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>: Who else?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Do I *look* like the kind of person who would ask rhetorical questions?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Who do you think I am? Superman?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Are you and Richard having a good time in this thread?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Would you like to join?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Do I seem like someone who'd be interested in doing that?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>How would I know?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Haven't you known me for years?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Can you ever really know another person?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Feeling philosophical today are you?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Who isn't?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>You're rather late coming to join us now, aren't you?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>*US*? Do you have a mouse in your pocket?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>There isn't an "us"? :-(
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>So, you're admitting that thing in your pocket is a mouse?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Did you think I was just glad to see you?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>How was I supposed to know that time would be different from all the others?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>How could you forget?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>So, your change in attitude is *my* fault?
>>>>>
>>>>>Was that a rhetorical question?
>>>>
>>>>That's the essential question, isn't it?
>>>
>>>Do you think it has an answer?
>>
>>Do you really think the answer is all that important?
>
>
> Doesn't that depend on whether there *is* an answer?
>
If it's true that there isn't an answer, what other response can we give
to one question but to reply with another one?
Proud member since 2007, WWWSC #1
Ann/Emma Anne #4
