On Sep 3, 8:08 am, Annie <SNIFFFT...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sep 3, 3:01 am, Mark Probert <mark.prob...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I am not aware of your past history. You give Quackwatch way too much
> > power..
>
> I have absolutely ZERO criminal history of any kind, and I don't even
> jay walk!
Always a good idea. I was not referring to a criminal history. I was
referring to what you had posted and I deleted.
> However, you and Frank talked about too much of my personal business
> that only a person tapping my lines,
I have never discussed anything about you with Frank, etc. If you
persist in making this bogus claim, please provide actual
documentation, since it will refer me to the person impersonating me.
> and bugging my residences could ever have known. Even connecting the
> old private investigator, in my past neighborhood to all of this, is
> sick and twisted. It never stopped, Mark. And all of us that have
> had this in our lives
> for way too long are going to do what we have to do to make it stop.
> It is the right thing to do.
Whatever. Howver, I am not involved in any of that.
>
> And with the old Mark Lindsay vs Paul Revere lawsuits all we did was
> state our
> opinion about things, and tell the truth. No one got anything. Even
> the Lindsay vs Revere suits-no one got any money. Both settled out of
> court. But the wire tapping, computer hacking, computer fraud,
> harassment, following, stalking, etc haven't stopped since
> approximately March 1997 to present, and it is very old; but I do know
> who we will see at the very bottom of the pile----that started this
> whole mess in the first place. I hope that individual (and her
> friends) realize that there could have been a reunion tour, and no
> lawsuits were ever needed.
I am totally uninterested in that.
> But I do know that Quackwatch and skeptics group members were involved
> over on the AOL boards and were involved in those lawsuits.
Provide proof.
>
> But instead, that individual (and her friends) made one huge gigantic
> mess by making up stuff that was not true, hoping to make a name for
> herself at the expense of others, and trying to damage the reputation
> of others. I believe in giving people second chances, Probert, but
> those second chances have long worn themselves out because it hasn't
> stopped, and no one should be taping anyone's lines for any reason,
> and no one should ever hack anyone's computer for any reason. What
> should have been between two old time friends (Mark Lindsay and Paul
> Revere) became one huge ugly mess on AOL, instead lawsuits were filed,
> and ruined old time relationships; but as time will march on (as it
> always does), I think I can help remedy the solution between those old
> time friends, and put them back together again. I'm going to talk to
> Mark about it soon. There's a solution, and at age 66, its never too
> late to get a back bone and go after the real offending parties.
Not interested. It is your business.
>
> If you are not involved, then help us figure out how it happened, and
> an email would would be appreciated.
Not interested. Not involved. I wish you the best. Forget about
Usenet.
