On Aug 28, 7:00 pm, Tess <XXFlamingStar...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> I am the second "defendent" in the lawsuit that was brought against
> both "Deb" and myself.
> For the record, yes it was real. Yes, the charges were brought by
> Mark Lindsay and Deb LIndsay via attorney Allen Hyman (though we on
> occassion address him as Allen Hymen, could have been fruediant, or
> maybe not).
>
> It was a very obscure lawsuit to say the least, most lawyers that were
> approached with the info in the suit first words were always...."what
> is this?", and we were and still are unsure ourselves.
> Neither of us had ever had dealings with the judicial system, (other
> than jury duty for me), so it was an experience, not an enjoyable one,
> but an experience. Not one that I would like to repeat either.
>
> The reasoning for the "suit" was never clear, but money was a factor.
> As to what was posted on "chat boards" back then was truely "opinion",
> and no one can be sued for "opinion", regardless of Mr. Hyman's/
> LIndsay's personal feelings. Granted, some of the "opinion" was not
> flattering nor supportive of Mr. LIndsay, his actions, or talent, but
> again it was "opinion".
>
> One of the oddities that we encountered was fact, that when "Deb" and
> I had conversations within the walls of her home, there would be
> posts out on the boards, with bits and pieces of our conversation.
> And NO, Deb did not post them herself as I was there, in the house
> when we would read them. So, how did this happen, unsure as to the
> actual "how to" but I too, was witness to : Clicking sounds on the
> phone, (sort of along the lines of someone picking up a second phone,
> but there was none in the house), and yes, I can confirm that there
> were "sounds" attributed to the computer, (this was before computers
> had that ability to converse other than via I/M and/or email)and the
> sounds/voices were not computer generated. And there were other
> assortments of "weird" occurances.
>
> The lawsuit was incrediably stressful, frustrating and mostly
> enfuriating. There were constant delays, postponments and papers,
> paperwork, and phone calls.
> It finally ended, being "dismissed" due to certain parties not
> appearing in court as ordered by the Judge. From me, was a deep sigh
> of relief that it was over! But, I sighed to quickly, for weeks it
> was dragged out by the law office of the Lindsay's. And there were
> "stipualtions" that had to be signed (which for the record, were under
> duress, therefore not binding), and for some reason it seemed that the
> attorney was on a fishing expedition for something else, but I suppose
> it never "panned" out as they hoped so they went on to other things.
> Eventually it wound it self down to a whimpering end. And that was the
> only "good thing" that came out of that experience for me.
> No one gained any money, I didn't lose any money as I represented
> myself, but it did leave a bitter taste for quite awhile, and made me
> sad to think that someone that I once had "teen aged" tender feeling
> for, became an unhappy person, living in a world of 'used to
> was"....but then again this last line is only my opinion.
>
In my humble opinion, only.....
Finding out recently that this lovely group of individuals had used
the Department of Defense inappropriately from approximately 1997 to
approximately 2 weeks ago for the lawsuits to stalk and continue to
harass us as if we were criminals. Tsk Tsk. Every one of us believes
in some form of alternative health care (as do our medical providers),
and to find out that electronic wireless mikes (look in the smoke
detectors and vents) and cameras were used is more than just
disgusting. People coming and going from our homes as if they felt
they had the absolute right to violate one's right to privacy. Not to
mention that the wiretapping of phones, unethical hacking that has
gone on and on and on; identity theft, and how about those telephone
calls you got recently from the White House....didn't realize that
you--and George and Laura were such good friends.
It isn't against the law to try alternative health remedies (almost
all healthcare providers provide for it in their plans); it is not
against the law to research for lawsuits, and how the DOD even got
involved back in approximately 1997 is beyond me. But learning that
Quackwatch was involved in those lawsuits and who was involved in my
present neighborhood, and past neighborhoods on May 13, 2008 none of
what transpired surprises me, however every attorney that I have
spoken with cannot believe the absolute hatred and violations of civil
rights that have happened over and over and over; including HIPPA. I
remember quite well all of the emails filled with porn we all
received; the hateful email messages and board postings scaring us to
no end, and the eery feeling that someone had been in our homes.
Finding telephone conversations plastered to AOL chatboards, and misc.
health.alternative and in home conversations; it was like we were
living in Nazi Germany. And then to find out that many of the
"players" on the old AOL boards weren't real fans in the first place,
but from the vast directory of Medical advisors, scientific advisors,
and skeptics groups worldwide, it became sad at best to realize that
the real RICO belonged in the hands of those that accused us of RICO
in the first place.
Freedom of speech only exists in their minds as long as it benefits
them. When things that were posted were of opinion, that they didn't
like, massive amounts of hatred would be aimed in our direction. They
used to refer to us as "the haters" when in fact it was they that were
"the haters." They had no clue about the true history of Paul Revere
and the Raiders, and it would appear that there was a daily or weekly
script or Cliff Notes they were using. And if we deviated from the
script, then we were sent hateful emails or hate messages were posted
towards us.
By the way, have you been able to find out who your new AbbyeOutz61
friend is yet?
