> On Jul 29, 2:00 pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > "Facts" is not a synonym for *idle conjecture*, but, you are too
> > stupid to know that.
>
> So exactly where does the information taken from illegally
> eavesdropping on people's homes go? What legal right does QW have to
> continue to harass people long after they lose lawsuits that they have
> orchestrated?
>
> Why does QW feel it has the right to personally stalk people for years
> after lawsuits are over with, and why
> has this continued with the witnesses for lawsuits that never went to
> trial for Paul Revere and the Raiders?
>
> Why did a private investigator move into my old neighborhood under
> suspicious conditions during the middle of lawsuits that were not even
> over with? Isn't tampering with a witness a crime?
>
> Why does this continue to this day?
>
> What I have posted are facts. I'd like a factual answer.
supporting facts. Like your claim that information in private phone
calls have been posted to the net. You claim it has been done, but
