Subject: Re: The Very Ancient Origin Of Contagionism
Author: Richard SchultzDate: 24 Jul
Ref:
In article <uOUhk.17110$89.5263@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com>, Jan Drew <jdrew1374@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
: PeterB is not the subject.
: Neither is Peter Bowditch who you say will correct you if you are wrong.
: Sad that you believe a proven liar who spams ALL newsgroups EVERY TIME he
: posts.
What is sad is that no matter how many times it is explained to you, you
refuse to understand that
(a) no one appointed you net.cop
(b) the phenomenon of "thread drift" has been a recognized and accepted
part of usenet communication for as long as usenet has been around
(c) mentioning someone's name in a post is not equivalent to making that
person the subject of the post
(d) when you post articles that have no substantive content but only
say "X is not the subject of the thread" and then turn around and post
articles that do not fit the nominal title of the thread, you reveal yourself
to be either seriously unintelligent, or a hypocrite, or both
(e) Peter Bowditch is not a spammer
: You mention book shops. However, you forgot he has those on his LYING and
: SPAMMING websites.
I was under the impression that there are bookshops in Australia unaffiliated
with Peter Bowditch. Doubtless he will correct me if I'm wrong.
-----
Richard Schultz schultr@mail.biu.ac.il
Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University
-----
"You don't even have a clue about which clue you're missing."
drceephd@insig…
Carole
