On Jun 26, 12:15 am, Citizen Jimserac <Jimse...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 25, 6:21 pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jun 25, 4:17 pm, Citizen Jimserac <Jimse...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 25, 8:33 am, Mark Probert <mark.prob...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > PROBEPOSTEROUS!!!!!!
>
> > > Are YOU, Proby-woby, the one who told me
> > > that ALL the Mercury was gone from the
> > > vaccines??
>
> > No, asshole, I never claimed that. How do I know that I never claimed
> > it? Because it is UNTRUE.
>
> I checked an earlier post of yours and
> SURPRISE! it seems you were right !!!
AS USUAL.
>
> Score: Proby -232
In addition to being illiterate and illogical, you are innumerate.
> > You see, idiot-fool, I do read the CDC website with an open mind, and
> > have read the vaccine tables listing the thimerosal content of
> > vaccines. I also read a lot of other things such as:
>
> >http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/grabit/acip-min-feb.pdf
>
> > which was a survey to see just how many pediatrician offices were
> > still using thimerosal containing vaccines. Note the reference to the
> > pharmaceutical companies exchange program. Do I have to explain that
> > for your very limited intellect?
>
> Wow! Multisyllabic words AND a coherent sentence!
> You've made two rational and intelligent comments in a row!!!
>
> (ASIDE...)HEY EVERYONE! I'VE FINALLY FIGURED OUT HOW
> TO COMMUNICATE WITH PROBY, YOU HAVE TO INSULT THE
> GUY EVERY OTHER SENTENCE AND THEN HE STARTS
> COMMUNICATING HALFWAYS RATIONALLY!!!!
>
> Ok nitwit let's resume...
However, dipwad, you did not understand what I wrote nor did you read
the link I provided.
> > Do read the entie 60+ pages, as I did. If that is too much for you,
> > the specific information is on a page where the numerals add up to 12.
>
> >http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/109867588/abstract?CRETRY=...
>
> > which is not direct proof that thimerosal containing vaccines were all
> > gone at a specific date, but does show just how fast a lot of vaccines
> > are used.
>
> OH!!! It's not direct proof is it??? The question is,
> how would a gullible moron like yourself know one way
> or the other??
Simply because I am way smarter than you, and my reading comprehension
and logic skills are far superior to yours. Thanks for asking.
> > Well it seems you were RIGHT...
>
> > > er, EXCEPT THAT IS FOR THE FLU VACCINES!
> > > (perhaps others too?)
>
> > No, idiot. Even the flu vaccine comes in a thimerosal free version.
>
> Tell it to Peter Bowsprit, he just his flu shots
> and forgot to ask for the thiMESSrosal free version.
> He's suffering from the delusion that there was
> no thimess in it (aside... if there wasn't, one wonders
> what WAS in it, heh heh, with the vaccine manufacturers
> you never know until AFTER you've gotten the shots!!)
He said he had the thimerosal free version. That is also documented on
the CDC website.
Do try to read for comprehension.
> > > Read this, old Probe, and weep:
> > > from Deirdre Imus article at:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/deirdre-imus/a-timely-truth-untold-aga_...
>
> > Diedre Imus? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>
> > You probably think that Jenny McCarthy is not a boob, either.
>
> I think she's got more guts than you for standing
> up to the vaccine manufacturers instead of gullibly
> accepting everything they say like a moron (=YOU!).
Actually, it is not her guts that got her where she is today. She uses
those siliCONES well.
> > > "The article also inaccurately reports that thimerosal-containing
> > > vaccines were "replaced" with thimerosal-free formulas in 2001.
> > > Thimerosal-containing vaccines were not recalled as the article
> > > suggests
>
> > The vaccine makers offered free swapping services instead.
>
> INDEED, SO IF PEOPLE DIDN'T KNOW ABOUT IT, THEY
> WOULDN'T BE BOTHERED. HOW CORPORATE OF THEM!!
Doctors were notifed. They had a choice. People do bear some degree of
responsibility for learning about their health. Of course, if they are
all as dumb as you, it would not make a difference.
> > > and remained on clinic shelves well into 2003, according to
> > > government communications.
>
> > Which Diedre has never made public. Imagine that. Joe McCarthy.
>
> WHICH THE VACCINE MAKERS NEVER MADE PUBLIC, IMAGINE THAT
> CHARLIE McCARTHY!!!!
No, dippy, not possible. Diedre is making a claim which she obviously
read something (if it exists) and she is not providing proof of
existence.
> >> In addition, the majority of flu shots,
> > > given to pregnant women and babies as young as six months, still
> > > contain 25 micrograms of thimerosal."
>
> > Wow. And the 25 mcg immediately dilute upon injection. Oh, wait, you
> > believe that thimerosal has a homeopathetic effect BECAUSE of the
> > dilution.
>
> Oh it "DILUTES" does it?
Surely does. How doyou think it is transported around the body? By
moped?
> > > THE MAJORITY OF FLU SHOTS STILL CONTAIN 25 MICROGRAMS
> > > OF THIMEROSAL? Why Probe, a little forgetfullness there in your
> > > analysis eh?
>
> > Not at all. I never claimed otherwise. Idiot.
>
> Ah then you feel its ALL OK AFTER ALL, EH?
Since there is no reason to be concerned with thimerosal, yes.
> > > And while YOU can't seem to get some verification
> > > on Homeopathy,
>
> > No, dipwad, YOU won't provide proof of the basics beliefs of
> > homeoquackery.
>
> OH POOR PROBY NEEDS CITIZEN JIMSERAC to provide proof for
> him.
I do not *need* you to do it. I challenged you to prove those points,
and you ducked and did the ostrich.
TSK TSK TSK, I understand, you're incapable of thinking
> for yourself. Perhaps its the Mercury in all the vaccines
> you've had, eh???
No, stupid. It is the homeopathic brain you have. Totally diluted.
> > women AND BABIES are STILL getting
> > > the thimerosal?!!!!!
>
> > So what? There is NO proof that thimerosal is harmful.
>
> Oh! THERE'S THAT PROOF WORD AGAIN - Since you don't think
> for yourself, maybe you just let the vaccine companies
> do your thinking for you, eh Charlie?
Wrong. It is YOU who are afraid of P R O O F. You probably do not know
what it means.
> Exactly how much Mercury is in the the thiMESSersol?
> Shall we call it 50%.
By percentage of molecular weight. If you were awake during high
school chemistry, you would be able to understand that this is
meangless. There is only 1 atom of Hg. Just one.
> Are you SURE you want to continue to assert that
> there is ... NO ... proof that the thimessersal is harmful?
Yes, I will. Since YOU have yet to provide an iota of proof that it
is.
> > > Perhaps this should be PROBED, EH?
> > > Yet another example of the inaccuracy, fallacy
>
> > and doubletalk from Big Brother Probee.
>
> I just have to ask you one more time, Probee,
> WHAT IS THE PROBE-BA-BILITY that the thimessersal
> is harmless?
Near 100% from everything I have read. Facts, not idle conjecture or
the lies of the merchants of disease, disability and death.
