On Jun 26, 5:42 pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 26, 5:35 pm, CitizenJimserac<Jimse...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 26, 9:21 am, Peter Bowditch <myfirstn...@ratbags.com> wrote:
>
> > > CitizenJimserac<Jimse...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >On Jun 25, 9:03 pm, Peter Bowditch <myfirstn...@ratbags.com> wrote:
> > > >> Mark Probert <mark.prob...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> > Well it seems you were RIGHT...
> > > >> >> er, EXCEPT THAT IS FOR THE FLU VACCINES!
> > > >> >> (perhaps others too?)
>
> > > >> >No, idiot. Even the flu vaccine comes in a thimerosal free version.
>
> > > >> When I had my flu shot a few weeks back I WAS NOT GIVEN THE OPTION of
> > > >> a mercury-free vaccine. I had to take what the doctor ordered.
>
>
> > > >> By the way - there was no mercury in it.
>
> > > >A young man, getting FLU shots??
> > > >Do you have some susceptibility to it?
>
> > > Yes. It is a consequence of being human.
>
> > Well then, young human, would you reveal
> > to us HOW MANY TIMES, exactly, you have
> > had the flu in the past?
>
> In the past fifteen years I have had the flu one time. I neglected to
> have the vaccine that year.
>
> And, it will never happen again.
>
> Thanks for asking.
Muck Probert!!!!
Actually I DID NOT ask you but, thanks for supporting
my argument that in healthy folk the flu
is sufficiently rare to OBVIATE THE NECESSITY
OF EVER GETTING SHOTS FOR IT.
Besides, as you very well know,
there is an easy way to "duck" it!!!!!
More denials and attacks please!
Citizen Jimserac
