On Jun 25, 6:21 pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 25, 4:17 pm, Citizen Jimserac <Jimse...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jun 25, 8:33 am, Mark Probert <mark.prob...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > PROBEPOSTEROUS!!!!!!
>
> > Are YOU, Proby-woby, the one who told me
> > that ALL the Mercury was gone from the
> > vaccines??
>
> No, asshole, I never claimed that. How do I know that I never claimed
> it? Because it is UNTRUE.
I checked an earlier post of yours and
SURPRISE! it seems you were right !!!
Score: Proby -232
> You see, idiot-fool, I do read the CDC website with an open mind, and
> have read the vaccine tables listing the thimerosal content of
> vaccines. I also read a lot of other things such as:
>
> http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/grabit/acip-min-feb.pdf
>
> which was a survey to see just how many pediatrician offices were
> still using thimerosal containing vaccines. Note the reference to the
> pharmaceutical companies exchange program. Do I have to explain that
> for your very limited intellect?
Wow! Multisyllabic words AND a coherent sentence!
You've made two rational and intelligent comments in a row!!!
(ASIDE...)HEY EVERYONE! I'VE FINALLY FIGURED OUT HOW
TO COMMUNICATE WITH PROBY, YOU HAVE TO INSULT THE
GUY EVERY OTHER SENTENCE AND THEN HE STARTS
COMMUNICATING HALFWAYS RATIONALLY!!!!
Ok nitwit let's resume...
>
> Do read the entie 60+ pages, as I did. If that is too much for you,
> the specific information is on a page where the numerals add up to 12.
>
>
> http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/109867588/abstract?CRETRY=...
>
> which is not direct proof that thimerosal containing vaccines were all
> gone at a specific date, but does show just how fast a lot of vaccines
> are used.
OH!!! It's not direct proof is it??? The question is,
how would a gullible moron like yourself know one way
or the other??
> Well it seems you were RIGHT...
>
> > er, EXCEPT THAT IS FOR THE FLU VACCINES!
> > (perhaps others too?)
>
> No, idiot. Even the flu vaccine comes in a thimerosal free version.
Tell it to Peter Bowsprit, he just his flu shots
and forgot to ask for the thiMESSrosal free version.
He's suffering from the delusion that there was
no thimess in it (aside... if there wasn't, one wonders
what WAS in it, heh heh, with the vaccine manufacturers
you never know until AFTER you've gotten the shots!!)
>
> > Read this, old Probe, and weep:
> > from Deirdre Imus article at:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/deirdre-imus/a-timely-truth-untold-aga_...
>
> Diedre Imus? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>
> You probably think that Jenny McCarthy is not a boob, either.
I think she's got more guts than you for standing
up to the vaccine manufacturers instead of gullibly
accepting everything they say like a moron (=YOU!).
>
> > "The article also inaccurately reports that thimerosal-containing
> > vaccines were "replaced" with thimerosal-free formulas in 2001.
> > Thimerosal-containing vaccines were not recalled as the article
> > suggests
>
> The vaccine makers offered free swapping services instead.
INDEED, SO IF PEOPLE DIDN'T KNOW ABOUT IT, THEY
WOULDN'T BE BOTHERED. HOW CORPORATE OF THEM!!
>
> > and remained on clinic shelves well into 2003, according to
> > government communications.
>
> Which Diedre has never made public. Imagine that. Joe McCarthy.
WHICH THE VACCINE MAKERS NEVER MADE PUBLIC, IMAGINE THAT
CHARLIE McCARTHY!!!!
>> In addition, the majority of flu shots,
> > given to pregnant women and babies as young as six months, still
> > contain 25 micrograms of thimerosal."
>
> Wow. And the 25 mcg immediately dilute upon injection. Oh, wait, you
> believe that thimerosal has a homeopathetic effect BECAUSE of the
> dilution.
Oh it "DILUTES" does it?
> > THE MAJORITY OF FLU SHOTS STILL CONTAIN 25 MICROGRAMS
> > OF THIMEROSAL? Why Probe, a little forgetfullness there in your
> > analysis eh?
>
> Not at all. I never claimed otherwise. Idiot.
Ah then you feel its ALL OK AFTER ALL, EH?
>
> > And while YOU can't seem to get some verification
> > on Homeopathy,
>
> No, dipwad, YOU won't provide proof of the basics beliefs of
> homeoquackery.
OH POOR PROBY NEEDS CITIZEN JIMSERAC to provide proof for
him. TSK TSK TSK, I understand, you're incapable of thinking
for yourself. Perhaps its the Mercury in all the vaccines
you've had, eh???
> women AND BABIES are STILL getting
> > the thimerosal?!!!!!
>
> So what? There is NO proof that thimerosal is harmful.
Oh! THERE'S THAT PROOF WORD AGAIN - Since you don't think
for yourself, maybe you just let the vaccine companies
do your thinking for you, eh Charlie?
Exactly how much Mercury is in the the thiMESSersol?
Shall we call it 50%.
Are you SURE you want to continue to assert that
there is ... NO ... proof that the thimessersal is harmful?
>
> > Perhaps this should be PROBED, EH?
> > Yet another example of the inaccuracy, fallacy
> and doubletalk from Big Brother Probee.
I just have to ask you one more time, Probee,
WHAT IS THE PROBE-BA-BILITY that the thimessersal
is harmless?
Citizen Jimserac
