On Jun 25, 4:17 pm, Citizen Jimserac <Jimse...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 25, 8:33 am, Mark Probert <mark.prob...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> PROBEPOSTEROUS!!!!!!
>
> Are YOU, Proby-woby, the one who told me
> that ALL the Mercury was gone from the
> vaccines??
No, asshole, I never claimed that. How do I know that I never claimed
it? Because it is UNTRUE.
You see, idiot-fool, I do read the CDC website with an open mind, and
have read the vaccine tables listing the thimerosal content of
vaccines. I also read a lot of other things such as:
http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/grabit/acip-min-feb.pdf
which was a survey to see just how many pediatrician offices were
still using thimerosal containing vaccines. Note the reference to the
pharmaceutical companies exchange program. Do I have to explain that
for your very limited intellect?
Do read the entie 60+ pages, as I did. If that is too much for you,
the specific information is on a page where the numerals add up to 12.
I also read this:
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/109867588/abstract?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0
which is not direct proof that thimerosal containing vaccines were all
gone at a specific date, but does show just how fast a lot of vaccines
are used.
Well it seems you were RIGHT...
> er, EXCEPT THAT IS FOR THE FLU VACCINES!
> (perhaps others too?)
No, idiot. Even the flu vaccine comes in a thimerosal free version.
> Read this, old Probe, and weep:
> from Deirdre Imus article at:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/deirdre-imus/a-timely-truth-untold-aga_...
Diedre Imus? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
You probably think that Jenny McCarthy is not a boob, either.
>
> "The article also inaccurately reports that thimerosal-containing
> vaccines were "replaced" with thimerosal-free formulas in 2001.
> Thimerosal-containing vaccines were not recalled as the article
> suggests
The vaccine makers offered free swapping services instead.
> and remained on clinic shelves well into 2003, according to
> government communications.
Which Diedre has never made public. Imagine that. Joe McCarthy.
In addition, the majority of flu shots,
> given to pregnant women and babies as young as six months, still
> contain 25 micrograms of thimerosal."
Wow. And the 25 mcg immediately dilute upon injection. Oh, wait, you
believe that thimerosal has a homeopathetic effect BECAUSE of the
dilution.
> THE MAJORITY OF FLU SHOTS STILL CONTAIN 25 MICROGRAMS
> OF THIMEROSAL? Why Probe, a little forgetfullness there in your
> analysis eh?
Not at all. I never claimed otherwise. Idiot.
> And while YOU can't seem to get some verification
> on Homeopathy,
No, dipwad, YOU won't provide proof of the basics beliefs of
homeoquackery.
women AND BABIES are STILL getting
> the thimerosal?!!!!!
So what? There is NO proof that thimerosal is harmful.
> Perhaps this should be PROBED, EH?
How about probing for your mind with a proctoscope?
> Yet another example of the inaccuracy, fallacy
> and doubletalk from Big Brother Probee.
Not at all, comprehension challenged one.
