On Jun 24, 6:58 pm, Jeff <kidsdoc2...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Jan Drew wrote:
> >http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2006/3/2/213632.shtml
>
> > A new study shows that autism may be linked after all
> > to the use of mercury in childhood vaccines, despite
> > government's previous claims to the contrary.
>
> The study is over two years old.
Quite true, and is written by the Geiers, known and proven liars as
well documented by
http://epiwonk.com/index.php?s=geier
http://neurodiversity.com/weblog/?q=geier
BTW, the ability of the writer of the Neurodiversity weblog was
recently referred to by a federal magistrate as :...the extent of the
information which a highly-competent librarian like Ms. Seidel can,
and did, accumulate..." This was in an order where the anti-
vaccination lawyer Shoemaker was being sanctioned for unethical
behavior when he subpoenaed Ms. Seidel in a case where she was not a
litigant.
> > An article in the March 10, 2006, issue of the Journal
> > of American Physicians and Surgeons shows that since
> > mercury was removed from childhood vaccines,
>
> Not a well-respected journal.
Correct. Well documented at:
http://neurodiversity.com/weblog/article/91/
> The analysis is suspect, at best.
You give it far too much credit.
They
> used the slope of lines to determine whether or not there was a change
> in the incidence of autism. I have never seen this methodology before.
> However, the incidence of autism continued to rise through the end of
> 2005, after mercury was removed from vaccines. By 2001, vaccines were no
> longer made that had mercury in them, so one would expect to see a
> reduction in autism incidence by 2005.
That is what David Kirby said, until he moved the goalposts when it
did not happen as predicted.
> Further, babies excrete mercury from vaccines more quickly than thought:http://www.urmc.rochester.edu/pr/news/story.cfm?id=1848
Correct. Excellent study.
