On Jun 24, 6:58 pm, Jeff <kidsdoc2...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Jan Drew wrote:
> >http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2006/3/2/213632.shtml
>
> > A new study shows that autism may be linked after all
> > to the use of mercury in childhood vaccines, despite
> > government's previous claims to the contrary.
>
> The study is over two years old.
>
> > An article in the March 10, 2006, issue of the Journal
> > of American Physicians and Surgeons shows that since
> > mercury was removed from childhood vaccines,
>
> Not a well-respected journal. The analysis is suspect, at best. They
> used the slope of lines to determine whether or not there was a change
> in the incidence of autism. I have never seen this methodology before.
> However, the incidence of autism continued to rise through the end of
> 2005, after mercury was removed from vaccines. By 2001, vaccines were no
> longer made that had mercury in them, so one would expect to see a
> reduction in autism incidence by 2005.
>
> Further, babies excrete mercury from vaccines more quickly than thought:http://www.urmc.rochester.edu/pr/news/story.cfm?id=1848
>
> Jeff
>
> <rest of copyrighted material deleted>
What a load of bullocks.
What the data shows is that ethylmercury, the organic mercury in
thimerosal, is rapidly depleted from the blood, but irreversably
deposited in the tissues and brains of the infants.
This paper is typical of the medical fraternity and demonstrates just
how incompetent they are to publish scientific data of any value.
Show us how much mercury was injected, show us how much was left in
the blood, then show us how much mercury came out in the urine and
feces. The remainder is still in the infants.
How can anyone look at these fools as medical gods when they publish
such garbage.
DrCee
You cannot secure nor restore health with pus or poisons.
